Your Latest RSPS News

Stay Updated with the Latest Insights and Stories in the RSPS Community


rspstoplist

2,273 views

 Share

The RSPS community is no stranger to flashy announcements and lofty promises, but Artemis RSPS, slated for launch on December 27th, 2024, has raised eyebrows for all the wrong reasons. With claims of "6+ months of development" and a "mind-blowing experience," Artemis RSPS is trying to make waves. However, a deeper dive reveals familiar tactics, recycled content, and a sharp decline in credibility.


A Decline That Speaks Volumes

Before we dive into Artemis, let’s take a quick look at StrattusX, Jonny’s previous project that fizzled out almost as quickly as it launched. The vote counts for StrattusX over the past three weeks paint a stark picture of its fall from grace:

  • Week 1: 1,645 votes
  • Week 2: 899 votes (45% drop)
  • Week 3: 476 votes (47% drop from Week 2, 71% total decline from Week 1)

Considering players can vote every 12 hours, these votes suggest StrattusX had an active player base of approximately 20–40 daily players by Week 3. This steep decline is a clear indicator of StrattusX’s inability to retain players, and all signs suggest Artemis RSPS may follow the same trajectory.


Rehashed Content and Empty Promises

Jonny’s announcement for Artemis RSPS is packed with buzzwords—“tons of raids,” “unique bosses,” and “jaw-dropping models.” Yet, there’s little evidence to back these claims. A closer look reveals that Artemis RSPS appears to be a re-skinned version of StrattusX, built on the same base code with minor cosmetic tweaks:

  • Reused Maps: The maps have been slightly re-themed but remain structurally identical to those in StrattusX.
  • Recycled Mechanics: The "unique bosses" are likely just re-skinned versions of existing NPCs, offering little in terms of fresh gameplay.
  • No Proof of Development: Despite claims of "6+ months of development," the Artemis RSPS Discord is eerily quiet. There are no posts about ongoing work, sneak peeks, or gameplay updates over the past six months.

It’s hard to ignore the parallels to StrattusX, which launched with similar fanfare only to crumble under its lack of substance and heavy focus on monetization.


Familiar Names, Familiar Concerns

Adding to the skepticism are the familiar Discord IDs involved in Artemis RSPS. If you see names like iamtherealluke, rhax, tamatea, or jonnyd3vs, proceed with caution. These individuals are notorious in the RSPS community for launching servers that prioritize short-term cash grabs over long-term player engagement. Their involvement in Artemis RSPS only strengthens concerns that this is another project designed to milk early donations before fading into obscurity.


The Cash Grab Playbook

If Artemis RSPS follows the same pattern as StrattusX, here’s what players can expect:

  1. Hype Building: Early giveaways, donation incentives, and promises of exclusive rewards to attract players at launch.
  2. Monetization-First Approach: Pay-to-win mechanics, loot boxes, and world-specific content locked behind paywalls.
  3. Player Decline: A rapid drop in active users as the initial excitement wanes and the server fails to deliver meaningful updates.

StrattusX’s failure wasn’t due to a lack of effort at launch—it was the inability to create a sustainable experience that kept players engaged. Artemis RSPS, with its rehashed content and lack of innovation, shows no signs of breaking this cycle.


Proceed With Caution

For players considering Artemis RSPS, the advice is simple: proceed with caution.

  • Wait for Feedback: Monitor early player reviews and gameplay footage before investing time or money.
  • Avoid Early Spending: Resist the temptation to participate in giveaways or donation deals until the server proves its worth.
  • Demand Transparency: Ask tough questions about what sets Artemis RSPS apart from StrattusX and hold the team accountable for delivering on their promises.

Final Thoughts

Artemis RSPS may be marketed as a groundbreaking server, but all signs point to it being a re-skinned cash grab. With recycled assets, a lack of transparency, and a team notorious for prioritizing monetization over meaningful content, it’s hard to see this as anything more than StrattusX 2.0.

The RSPS community deserves better than empty promises and recycled ideas. Until Artemis RSPS can demonstrate a genuine commitment to quality and innovation, players should approach with a critical eye—and their wallets firmly closed.

Time will tell whether Artemis RSPS is a fresh start or just another fresh coat of paint. But if history is any indication, it’s likely to follow the same path as its predecessors: a rapid rise, an even faster fall, and a disappointed community left in its wake.

 Share

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...